Open insulin, 'DIY bio' and the future of pharma

September 13, 2018, Colorado State University

The development, manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical drugs in the United States is a complex landscape involving intellectual property and strict federal regulations.

But according to Colorado State University scientists, the status quo of the U.S. pharmaceutical market may soon be turned on its head. That's due in part to a growing community of do-it-yourself "biohackers" who are disrupting business-as-usual for pharmaceutical discovery, development and distribution.

A Sept. 13 perspective piece in Trends in Biotechnology frames these emerging issues, and predicts how the pharmaceutical industry, and the U.S. regulatory environment, will need to change in response. The paper's authors are Jean Peccoud, the Abell Chair in Synthetic Biology in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering; Jenna Gallegos, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering; and collaborators from Bio-Link Australia, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Boston University School of Public Health. Peccoud is also a faculty member in the School of Biomedical Engineering at CSU.

As the prices of many medicines continue to rise, new models of funding, research and development have emerged as part of what the authors call a "novel innovation ecosystem." Most notably, this ecosystem involves drug manufacturing at smaller, more personalized scales.

"Key drugs are still too expensive," Peccoud said. "People don't have access to them, so what if they can make it themselves? What do we do about that?"

The authors use the California-based Open Insulin Project as a case study of how the DIY bio movement might shape the future of medicine. Founded in 2015, the project's creators are trying to increase competition in the insulin market by developing and releasing an open-source protocol for manufacturing off-patent insulin.

Why does the Open Insulin Project exist in the first place? Insulin is 100 years old, but it remains prohibitively expensive for many patients, with some uninsured patients paying up to $400 a month for this life-saving medicine. People are angry, and in some cases, people are dying, from lack of access to affordable insulin.

The U.S. regulatory system today favors existing manufacturers of biologic drugs like insulin. Biologics are drugs made from a living organism, as opposed to small-molecule drugs, such as aspirin, which are synthesized chemically. When making off-patent small-molecule drugs, a competing company need only demonstrate that they've made pure aspirin. But biologic drugs are more difficult to control for quality; thus competing companies have to do expensive human clinical trials—not worth the $250 million price tag, if they can't even file for a patent to recoup their investments.

While the structure of human insulin is no longer patent protected, the handful of large companies that produce insulin continue to market "" that are supposedly improved varieties of plain insulin. The authors note that the medical benefits of these new versions of insulin are debatable.

That's where the biohackers come in. If the Open Insulin Project succeeds in developing a protocol for "home-brewed" insulin, they'll need to avoid violating patent-protected methods of manufacturing insulin. But biohackers making insulin for their own, personal use wouldn't need to worry about patent infringement—although safety considerations are certainly at play.

"It would be prudent for regulators to engage patients and innovators in community bio-labs to design adaptive oversight that fosters an ethos of responsibility," the authors say.

The real challenge for Open Insulin Project biohackers, should they want to enable competing pharmaceutical companies to sell off-patent insulin, will be regulation, the authors say. The success of the project will be severely limited by the cost of regulatory approvals, which include proving biological consistency, safety and possibly efficacy.

If such new models of are to succeed, they will depend on alternative approval processes, the authors say. If biosimilarity of biohacked could be confirmed without clinical trials, the cost of development would dramatically decrease. This could be achieved through smaller-scale, decentralized manufacturing. And the technology already exists; microbioreactors that are capable of producing smaller doses of biologics have been developed in university labs.

"In short, the status quo has got to change," Gallegos said. "We can't address the issues if we don't acknowledge them."

Explore further: Increasing cost of insulin has serious health consequences

Related Stories

Increasing cost of insulin has serious health consequences

August 4, 2018

(HealthDay)—The increasing cost of insulin is potentially exposing those with diabetes to serious health consequences, according to an American Diabetes Association statement published in the June issue of Diabetes Care.

WHO issues recommendations for Tx intensification in T2DM

September 5, 2018

(HealthDay)—Recommendations have been developed by the World Health Organization for treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes. The recommendations were published online Sept. 4 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Recommended for you

Detangling DNA replication

September 18, 2018

DNA is a lengthy molecule—approximately 1,000-fold longer than the cell in which it resides—so it can't be jammed in haphazardly. Rather, it must be neatly organized so proteins involved in critical processes can access ...

The gene code of growing limbs

September 18, 2018

When a fetus develops, cell division and differentiation, gene expression, cell-to-cell signaling, and morphogenesis must be carefully coordinated to occur in the correct sequence and for the proper amount of time. Failures ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

V4Vendicar
not rated yet Sep 13, 2018
Drug companies have increased the price they charge for insulin by 400 to 600 percent over the last decade or so.

There is no justification, and the only explanation is pure greed.

The patent for Insulin was sold by it's Canadian discoverers for $1,.00.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.
<主站链轮 <主站链轮 葡京网上,澳门电玩城,拉菲2平台,葡京国际赌城 <主站链轮 博天下,丰禾棋牌,线上利盈网,365下注平台
<主站链轮 <主站链轮 好运博彩,澳门赌博网,波音bbin,澳门乐天堂 <主站链轮 申博网,宝盈国际,新2娱乐场,365在线体育
<主站链轮 <主站链轮 千赢国际,菠菜娱乐场,尊爵现金赌博,现金娱乐赌场 <主站链轮 明升娱乐,赌博网官网,晨丽赌场官网,亿游国际
<主站链轮 <主站链轮 必博娱乐,百佬会赌场,新伟德在线,海尔现金赌城 <主站链轮 大发盘球,全讯投注网,真钱足球投注,澳门赌博机